The Burns facility held fewer than 550 long-term horses in 2017, so many Oregon horses were sent to pastures in the Midwest. Those animals that are not suitable for adoption are sent to federally funded sanctuaries or long-term holding facilities, where they live out their lives on the prairie. Annual adoptions fell from a high of 8,000 per year in the early 2000s to about 3,500 in 2017. The adoption program, however, has never kept pace with the number of animals available. Animals removed from the Oregon range are taken to the Wild Horse Corral Facility near Burns, where over 16,000 animals have been prepared for the adoption program. Normally, three to five of Oregon’s HMAs are gathered annually to remove excess animals and balance population numbers with the range’s capacity to sustain them. In 2018, an estimated 4,682 wild horses and 49 wild burros were roaming on Oregon’s HMAs and the Wild Horse Territory, 75 percent more than the BLM’s recommended population of 2,690 animals. In southeastern Oregon, the BLM now manages 17 Herd Management Areas (HMAs) and co-manages one Wild Horse Territory with the U.S. The act requires the protection, management, and study of "unbranded and unclaimed horses and burros on public lands in the United States," and the Bureau of Land Management was given the responsibility for managing the Wild Horse & Burro Program (WH&B).
Johnston, known as “Wild Horse Annie,” ran a grassroots campaign in Nevada that led to the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971. The number of wild horses and burros diminished significantly during the decades of western settlement, as people encroached on their range and exploited the animals for commercial purposes.
Within a hundred years, wild horses again populated the plains, while modern breeds eventually diluted or replaced most of the Spanish strains. Those animals became extinct in the Americas at least 11,000 years ago, and it wasn’t until the early sixteenth century that Spanish explorers and missionaries reintroduced horses into the American West. However, we cannot allow all interpretations to be given equal consideration, because not all of them make sense/are supported by the facts.Scientists believe that the ancestors of today's horses evolved in North America 3.5 million years ago. With all that said, though: for this particular song, I think A FEW different interpretations are fine, considering the semi-vague, poetic nature of the lyrics. And that's simply not the case, with song interpretations or most everything else. Specifically, you have fallen into the belief that all opinions are equal, and no one's opinion is ever wrong. Ultimately, your viewpoint on this is similar to a lot of erroneous, New Age-y Internet beliefs. In addition, it doesn't depend entirely on the audience to interpret art, unless the artist has intentionally made something vague and/or complex in order to garner different reactions/interpretations. And sometimes, even when the artists themselves explicitly say what the song's about (often, the artists say it numerous times over the course of decades), people still spread the same old false stories about the song, or make up new, crazier theories about it. Oftentimes, interpretations are way too "deep", or too "shallow". Many interpretations of songs are gonzo, to say the least. Just my personal interpretation of this awesome Not every interpretation should be given consideration, though.
#WILD HORSES FREE#
The singer has idealized both the person and the situation they have desired,and is aware of it.They are free of certain restraints and conventions but are growing older and time is catching up.The faith in the outcome they desired is fading,acceptance of fate and reality is imminent,and we are not getting any younger,damn it,so let's make the best of what time we may or may not have left. I have my freedom,but I don't have much time.įaith has been broken tears must be cried, "I know I've dreamed you,a sin and a lie No matter what differences or rivalries there may be,there is a loyalty to this particular person that others may not be afforded - the singer has perhaps been bitter toward some,and unkind at times,but there is one person he/she will never feel that bitterness to,no matter what(my own interpretation). "No sweeping exits or off stage lines could make me feel bitter,or treat you unkind" My InterpretationI first heard the Stones version as a teen in the late 1980s and have heard all the other versions and will just add my personal interpretation of the song.
0 kommentar(er)
